Visit Kevin Burkholder's column >>

KEVIN BURKHOLDERHome Page

Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Perceiving (Idealist)
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 12; Links Seeded: 14
Member Since: 10/2006Last Seen: 11/07/2009

The Value of Employee Empowerment - Part 1

advertisement

Empowerment – another over used buzzword and misused concept in today’s business. But what does empowerment mean and how can businesses and employees benefit from empowerment?

 

What does Empowerment mean?

According to Wikipedia: “In the sphere of management and organizational theory, "empowerment" often refers loosely to processes for giving subordinates (or workers generally) greater discretion and resources: distributing control in order to better serve both customers and the interests of employing organizations.”

Many businesses have empowerment programs that have all the good intentions but fail on two accounts. The first is actually empowering employees. Rhetoric may be spoken and intentions may be good, but control and power are still maintained by managers and executives. Second, they lack initiative to train and coach employees to take control. You cannot wave your magic wand and say ”you are now empowered” and expect employees to change. As well, saying “yes, our employees are empowered” does not make it so.

Also from Wikipedia: “Empowerment in the workplace is regarded by critics as more a pseudo-empowerment exercise, the idea of which is to change the attitudes of workers, so as to make them work harder rather than giving them any real power.”

How many of you recognize the latter definition from Wikipedia over the former?

 

Authority and Power

In order to understand what empowerment is, we must first understand a couple of other concepts.

First is authority. There are two types of authority - formal and informal. Philip Van Houser[i] (2003) defines these in his “Leadership Journey” series:

Formal Authority

The organizational power that comes with the position one holds.

Informal Authority

The personal influential power that comes as a result of one person voluntarily choosing to support or follow another.

Second is power. Again, Van Houser defines:

Power

The ability to grant, withhold or withdraw something someone else wants or needs.

So empowerment, or “to empower someone” is to willingly and knowingly grant our official power to others.

Let’s put these concepts to work through example.

An employee comes to you with a request for new equipment. As a manager, you ask a few questions in regard to why this equipment is needed, what it will cost, what is the benefit of having it, and what is the detriment of not having it. You then make a decision.

“Okay, go ahead and get the new equipment.” You’ve just used your formal authority and power to grant something someone else wants or needs. Not only that, you’ve emotionally satisfied that employee simply by (implicitly or explicitly) agreeing with his or her decision on the need and justification for that new equipment.

What if your decision is “well, let’s wait”. Possibly because you want to wait for the next budget cycle or for the results of the next marketing campaign or any number of reasons. You have just used your power to withhold something someone else wants or needs. Now that employee is discouraged, upset, or even angry.

The emotional response of these examples pales in comparison when you withdraw something someone else already has. You can be assured that he or she is going to be disappointed, distressed and frustrated and these emotions can be very difficult to deal with.

We must first understand power before we can understand empowerments. It’s also important to understand the emotional responses from our use of power.

 

Empowerment

Empowerment is “willingly and knowingly granting our official power to another”. Or to give up that official power to grant withhold or withdraw to someone else.

Empowerment is using your power, not to withhold or withdraw, but to grant to another the power that you’ve worked to obtain.

Of course, as said before, you can’t just wave your magic wand and say, “you are now empowered” and expect it to happen. Empowerment takes training and coaching. Especially for employees who are not used to being empowered, they will likely be very hesitant.

What happens when you try to empower a group of employees who have never been empowered before? It depends on their comfort level. It’s much easier to say “no, I’m more comfortable (and safer) to wait to be told what to do; to wait for instruction”. Then again, others may be eager to jump at the chance. They know what needs to be done, why wait?

Empowerment happens at the individual level but only works in a team environment. Employees who do not value team success or are only interested in personal success are more likely to be disinterested in empowerment or worse, will abuse newly obtained power.

Coaching and training is needed at all levels to overcome the potential disadvantages. Managers must learn to let go of their official power. They must learn to coach employees on the appropriate use of the power handed to them in regard to the overall business objectives. Managers must learn to trust their employees even, at times, when they disagree with their decisions. They must focus on outcomes and results rather than procedures.

Employees must learn that their power is not to be abused. The must learn to work together as a team and to make decisions directed towards team success. They must be willing to accept and learn to mitigate risks. Employees must be able to trust their manager, their team members, and themselves.

 

Benefits of Empowerment

Empowerment involves a conceptual mindset geared towards assuring success rather than preventing failure. This is certainly beyond the typical "blame culture" that blocks employees from believing in themselves and their judgments.

People are our most important asset and our most underutilized resource. Independent entrepreneurship and initiative lead to higher levels of employee engagement, increased employee contribution including innovation and productivity, and fewer conflicts due to involvement in the decision making process.

Many organizations are driven by tangible metrics such as profits, output and quality. The benefits of empowerment and involvement tend to be underestimated due to the difficulties of measuring their effects in quantifiable ways.

 

Conclusion

From Wikipedia: Research suggests that the opportunity to exercise personal discretion/choice (and complete meaningful work) is an important element contributing to employee engagement and well-being. There is evidence… that initiative and motivation are increased when people have a more positive attributional style. This influences self-belief, resilience when faced with setbacks, and the ability to visualize oneself overcoming problems. The implication is that “empowerment” suits some more than others, and should be positioned in the broader context an “enabling” work environment.

Empowerment is an important concept and practice in any business. What we’ve covered in this article are simple explanations of authority and power that will, hopefully, lead to a better understanding of empowerment.

In part 2, we’ll talk more about empowerment at work and the six levels of empowerment.

 

###

[i] Phillip Van Hooser, MBA,CSP, 2003,  The Leadership Journey: Practical Skills for Leadership Success.

--

Kevin Burkholder * EarthAsylum Consulting
Getting Work Done Through People, Getting People Done Through Work.
Web Site : Newsletter : Blog

  • 7 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.5
{"commentId":453606,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

Wonderful article and career focus. In some ways it reminds me of the programs implemented by groups like the Rainforest Alliance. All good is good and it is always nice to see initiatives that put bread on more than one table, continued success to you.

{"commentId":453606,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Sun Dec 31, 2006 2:44 PM EST
{"commentId":456956,"authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}

Thanks Pamela, I appreciate the encouragement. It's a tough sell because it's never on anyone's priority list.

{"commentId":456956,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}
    #1.1 - Wed Jan 3, 2007 10:43 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":453698,"authorDomain":"danish"}
    How many of you recognize the latter definition from Wikipedia over the former?

    (Raising my hand)

    In my experience, professional responsibilities, power and salary have to form a harmonic triangle. There is nothing worse than having much informal power, but little or not authority - and if the salary is out of balance, all I can advice is: Run like hell. These people are not going to make the changes that will make things run smooth.

    {"commentId":453698,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"danish"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#2 - Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:58 PM EST
    {"commentId":456970,"authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}

    You can do a lot with informal authority - provided that those with the formal authority allow it. More often than not they don't. It's hard to ask those with authority or power to give it up even when, in the long run, they'd be better for it.

    I had an interesting conversation just recently about salaries and that in most cases, you reach a point where the only way to make more money is to move into a management role. I think this concept is absurd. The person I was talking with is great in their technical position but reached the salary ceiling. Now he's a mediocre manager who is training someone to do his former job. The company is spending more money and getting less work. They should have just paid him based off of the value he brings to the company instead of some perceptual limit assigned by HR.

    So the question is, can an employee make more money than his/her boss? I think most businesses would say no, but I think their wrong. People should get paid what they're worth regardless of their "rank" and empowering people adds value.

    I like the "harmonic triangle" - nice concept.

    {"commentId":456970,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Wed Jan 3, 2007 10:53 AM EST
    {"commentId":456987,"authorDomain":"danish"}

    As you can tell, I have obviously "been there". Quite frankly, it became too much for me having to make a lot of executive decisions, then struggling to explain to the actual manager, then sometimes having other managers overruling me, then having to explain why that was a disaster course, then stressing to meet deadlines, etc. All the responsibility, and eventually I applied for my job to become a formal management position, scaring everybody to death. Finally I looked at my track record, compared it with my salary and thought: You are the hell of a guy. You need to do better. I don't, but I am not locked down with 20 hours of stand by time, three meetings a day, informal representation in evenings and weekends, being fed paper work from three different departments, and shooting out Power Point presentations when I sneeze... :)

    {"commentId":456987,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"danish"}
    • 2 votes
    #2.2 - Wed Jan 3, 2007 11:05 AM EST
    Reply
    {"commentId":457021,"authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}

    Without getting up on my soap box for too long, it all comes down to strengths. People should do what they're good at - and they should get paid for it. If you're a good manager, manage. If not, don't. Management is just another job and when you have managers that aren't good at managing, you end up with endless paper work, 3 meetings a day, and constant waiting. But generally, we don't know what good management is so we don't recognize bad management - because it's normal.

    When people are doing what they're good at, they're happier, more productive and produce better results for the company.

    I left my job for these reasons. I wasn't happy with what I was doing, I wasn't able to do (enough of) what I was good at, and I didn't see it getting any better. I worse off financially now but, hopefully, that's just temporary.

    And since I bashed management, let me add this... I admire and respect good managers. It's not an easy job and it takes talent. Good managers are what makes a company good.

    {"commentId":457021,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}
      Reply#3 - Wed Jan 3, 2007 11:30 AM EST
      {"commentId":507121,"authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}

      Here's Part 2 - The 6 Levels of Empowerment

      Empowerment is not simply empowerment. There are different levels, different applications, and different times and circumstances where you need to use different levels of empowerment with the people your are working with.

      Each level of empowerment is progressive, meaning that level 1 is the lowest and gives the least amount of power whereas level 6 is the highest and gives the most amount of power

      One of the beauties of the six levels of empowerment is that it can be the basis of an employee development program. When you look at empowerment as an active plan and work to bring employees up the ladder and to also bring your willingness and trust up the same ladder, you can see just how powerful empowerment can be.

      {"commentId":507121,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}
        Reply#4 - Thu Feb 1, 2007 3:54 PM EST
        {"commentId":4613045,"authorDomain":"lrolle81"}

        I love the article.

        It brings balance to the fast growing employee empowerment movement. I am all for employee empowerment and your article shows the reality of the concept. It also directs a manager ( developing leader) like myself, on how to actively empower others.

        {"commentId":4613045,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"lrolle81"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:19 PM EST
        {"commentId":4613372,"authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}

        Thanks! It's not always easy and it's too easy to give up on. I think one key statement from the article is:

        They must focus on outcomes and results rather than procedures.

        {"commentId":4613372,"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385","authorDomain":"EarthAsylum"}
          #5.1 - Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:41 PM EST
          Reply
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"64698","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"64698","contentId":"501385"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking